
By Cemil Turan
It is undeniable that “Arab Spring” has strongly influenced political developments in Muslim countries, whether one agrees with the results of these popular uprisings or not. Somehow, political developments in Turkey are affected too, they have taken another form. Turkey’s Prime Minister, Recep Tayyp Erdogan has supported the “Arab spring” and has shaped accordingly his policy-making inside the country.
It is true that in the eight years of Erdogan’s government significant progress has been made for the democratization of the country, human rights as well as the weakening of the “deep state”. The incumbent, the Kemalist military and the conservative, regressive opposition of Turkey were faced with a political man who was determined for large and democratic changes.
And, this opposition has a really broad front, stretching from the extreme right to the left, within a strange agglomeration of forces and reactions, even on matters that were banners of political demands such as the Constitutional change that was enacted and applied since Evren’s junta. So, when Erdogan announced a referendum for the change of the junta constitution, all opposition reacted to something that should have been accepted with relief and support. In contrast to this puzzling reaction front, Turkish people rewarded Erdogan’s referendum.
Then, in the year of referendum, in 2009, Erdogan spoke to the minorities of Turkey, with statements that will remain in history: “Several ethnic minorities were expelled in this country. What have we won? Perhaps it’s time to think about our mistakes?”. After those statements, the state returned confiscated property to minorities.
It is true that Erdogan’s movements seem to be following the footsteps of the former President of the Republic of Turkey, Ozal. Ozal, in 1985, during his visit in Algeria, apologized to the Algerian people, because in 1958, in UN, when there was a resolution on the independence of Algeria, Turkey had stood neutral. Similarly, Erdogan, as the country’s Prime Minister, apologized to Kurdish people.
After the founding of the Turkish state, in 1922, in Kurdistan there have been many revolts against the Kemalist regime - 1925 the revolt of Sheikh Said, 1930-33 in Ararat and in 1936-39 in Dersim. Erdogan, based on official documents of the Turkish government, which bear the signature of the Minister of the interior Faik Oztrak, stated that in the last Dersim uprising 13,806 people were killed. “All the evidence shows that in Dersim there was genocide against the Kurdish people. Someone has to apologize, as a Prime Minister I am doing it, I apologize for this genocide. ”
That was really a big step in the Kurdish issue that initiated developments, along with several other democratization measures, for the smooth solution of the problem. This is something that probably the opposition does not wish. Many are those who argue that the armed conflicts that started in the border region are not at all random and “innocent”. There are also many who do not hesitate to say that behind this conflict there is an Israel’s plan and assistance to the Syria’s PKK.
Syria has every reason to help the PKK militants since the rivalry with Turkey is lasting for years and it has to do with territorial as well as “maritime” claims. Things have now deteriorated because of Turkey’s supportive attitude towards Syrian opposition. And those who forced Turkey to take an active part in the operation against Qaddafi, changing the initial position of non-intervention, have now left Turkey almost alone to support the revolt of the Syrian people. Besides, it is a fact that Erdogan has generally supported the rebellions of peoples in other Arab countries. It was therefore expected to take several measures against the Syrian government.
The Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu has announced the sanctions that Turkey decided to impose on Syria, which consist of nine points and which freeze Turkish-Syrian relation till the formation of a government reconciled with the people. These measures are:
- Inhibition of strategic cooperation,
- Imposition of travel ban to Syrian officials
- Cessation of arm sales,
- Closure of the land, air and maritime space,
- Freeze of relations with the central bank,
- Freeze of the assets of Syria to Turkey
- Freeze of credit relations,
- Cessation of relations with the Commercial Bank of Syria
- Suspension of the loan agreement with Eximbank.
These measures were accompanied by the statement by Turkish Prime Minister: “We can not remain silent in the face of what is happening.”
Turkish government also allowed the opposition in Syria, Kurds and Arabs (Shi’ites and Sunnis) to make their meetings in Turkey. However, similar measures took Syria against Turkey too.
Everyone expects that the regime change in Syria will drift Iran too. Syrian people have reached their limits. Thousands of people, because of fear of death, flee on the Turkish side of the border, in Hatay town, where three refugee camps have been established. The Red Crescent with the help of the Turkish government has set up these camps which operate under satisfying conditions. The number of refugees fluctuates depending on developments in Syria. And right here is found another paradox of Turkish opposition: it disagrees and holds a negative attitude to this humanitarian assistance to the Syrian refugees.
And this absolute refusal has culminated with the latest denouncements of the opposition against Erdogan’s government. The cause of denouncements is recorded tapes that were given to the media and which include talks of contacts and meetings between MIT Turkey secret service and representatives of the PKK in Europe. One such meeting was held in Oslo among the head of MIT Hakan Fidan, deputy head Afet Gunes and the PKK.
It is unknown who channeled these tapes to the media, but their purpose was clear: not to solve the Kurdish issue. The opposition quickly denounced the Turkish government of sitting at the same table negotiating with Kurdish terrorists and it also tried to drift the Turkish people to this curse dance, who, however, gave absolutely no meaning or weight to the complaints.
Finally, Erdogan has won the trust of Turkish people and moves on to establish the new Turkish Constitution, with the participation in this democratic venture of intellectuals, professors, political and economic personalities. And, it is has been argued that this “wise men” committee has one and only concern: solving people’s problems as well as the democratization of the country. A constitution which we believe will lead to solving the Kurdish issue and then indeed we will have the real apology by Turkish Prime Minister to the Kurdish people. Furthermore, it will be another key step in achieving Erdogan’s the ambitions.
Author is well-known Journalist and Writer
http://www.balkanspace.org/mat.php?lang=2&idm=177&idr=36